Thursday, June 12, 2014
Soalan SIVARASA di Parlimen 11hb June 2014
39. PR-1322-L61934
Tuan R. Sivarasa [ Subang ] minta MENTERI KEWANGAN
menyatakan kenapa USD3 bilion yang dipinjam oleh IMDB Global
Investments Ltd. (1MGIL) untuk pembangunan TRX diletak dengan
institusi yang tidak dinamakan dalam akaun berkanun 1MDB untuk
tahun 2013; berikan nama insitutusi tersebut dan juga nyatakan
kenapa perjanjian untuk pelaburan itu tidak benarkan faedah, dividen
atau edaran kepada 1MDB.
Soalan SIVARASA di Parlimen 10hb June 2014
28. PR-1322-L61922
Tuan R. Sivarasa [ Subang ] minta MENTERI PENDIDIKAN
menyatakan status terkini enam buah sekolah Tamil yang pada 22
Januari 2012 diumum oleh YAB. Perdana Menteri akan dibina di Sg.
Petani, Sg. Siput, Klang, Petaling Jaya, Kajang dan Masai di mana
juga diumumkan lesen untuk 6 sekolah tersebut telah diluluskan oleh
Jemaah Menteri.
Soalan SIVARASA di Parlimen 9hb June 2014
38. PR-1322-L61932
Tuan R. Sivarasa [ Subang ] minta MENTERI PENGANGKUTAN
menyatakan siapakah Kapten yang disebut dalam laporan Kementerian
Pengangkutan 03/2014 yang memohon maklumat tentang pesawat MH370
pada jam 5.20 pagi pada 8 Mac 2014 dan beritahu MH370 never left
Malaysian airspace.
40. PR-1322-L61924
Tuan R. Sivarasa [ Subang ] minta MENTERI PENDIDIKAN menyatakan
sama ada Kerajaan Barisan Nasional sedia meluluskan satu lesen baru untuk
Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil Seaport di lokasi asalnya di SS7 Kelana
Jaya dan kekalkan lesen lamanya di sekolah baru yang sekarang berada di
Kampung Lindungan.
Soalan SIVARASA di Parlimen Khamis 12hb June 2014
118. PR-1322-L61933
Tuan R. Sivarasa [ Subang ] minta MENTERI KEWANGAN menyatakan
kenapa USD2.3 bilion yang diperoleh oleh 1Malaysia Development Berhad
(1MDB) daripada Petrosaudi International Ltd. apabila pelaburan 1MDB
ditamatkan di September 2012 tidak dikembalikan ke Malaysia dan
dimasukkan dalam satu syarikat SPC (segregated portfolio company) di
Cayman Islands dengan pengurus dana yang tidak dinamakan dan dalam
keadaan pengarah-pengarah 1MDB telah berkata mereka tidak ada kawalan
terhadap SPC tersebut.
Friday, May 23, 2014
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
Terence Netto gets it wrong regarding Anwar and PKR
I write this in response to Terence Netto's comment in Mkini on Saturday 10th May titled "Anwar under attack in PKR".
Terence,quite oddly, did not speak to any of us named in the meeting as present in Anwar's house ( myself, Nurul Izzah, Tian Chua, Dr Syed Husin) despite his 40 years of experience as a journalist, before he wrote his article.
Clearly he preferred to rely solely on secondhand and possible third-hand accounts of what allegedly took place to base his account rather than to also talk directly to those he had named.
As a consequence of swallowing wholesale the version of his sources, he got some very basic facts wrong.
Terence stated that Saifuddin and Elisabeth Wong were there - that is false.
He also stated incorrectly that subsequently Dr Syed met Saifuddin to discuss whether he would withdraw. This is also not true.
After reading Terence's article, Dr Syed Husin sent him an sms saying he had never met Saifuddin to discuss such a matter.
Terence, very oddly again, continues to leave in his article the statement saying Dr Syed had never denied meeting Saifuddin, or even publish Dr Syed's response to him.
He also does not publish Dr Syed's statement in his sms saying that Terence's allegation that Tan Sri Khalid had left in a "huff" was not true.
Dr Syed had told Terence that Tan Sri had simply left at the time he had said he would leave for another engagement. In fact, Tan Sri Khalid shook everyone's hand, including mine, cordially in his customary style before leaving.
However the key sting of his story was that this was a meeting orchestrated by Anwar since it took place at his home, and it was Anwar's agenda to get Tan Sri Khalid to withdraw.
Terence ought to understand a simple matter - Anwar is not responsible for the agenda and content of discussion of every meeting of groups of party leaders at his home or office or anywhere else for that matter. Many of these meetings happen at the behest of some or all of those who are present. To assert otherwise is simply being disingenous.
Finally the suggestion made by Terence that the meeting discussed the continuation of Tan Sri Khalid as MB of Selangor as a quid pro quo of his withdrawal is false. It was improper and unfair to assert this as a fact when none of those said to have been present at the discussion were even asked by Terence for a response.
Finally I need to place on record that Anwar said in that discussion he will not be asking anyone to withdraw. This is the only part of a private discussion amongst individuals which I will disclose because it relates directly to the spin in Terence's article that this is an Anwar orchestrated agenda.
Sivarasa Rasiah
Political Bureau member
Parti Keadilan Rakyat
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
