Lokasi Pusat Khidmat

Pusat Khidmat Masyarakat - Ahli Parlimen SUBANG

6-2, Jalan Pekaka 8/4, Seksyen 8, Kota Damansara, 47810 Petaling Jaya, Selangor.




Isnin -Jumaat: 9:00 pagi - 5:00 ptg

Tel: 03 6157 1842 Fax: 03 - 6157 2841

Pages

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

IGP IS LYING TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT YB NURUL IZZAH'S REMAND


PRESS STATEMENT

IGP IS LYING TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT YB NURUL IZZAH'S REMAND

I make this press statement in my capacity as counsel for YB Nurul Izzah assisting her in her attendance at IPD Dang Wangi  this afternoon commencing from about 2.15 pm yesterday Monday 16th March 2015

I have just read a press statement issued by the Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Dato'Sri Khalid bin Abu Bakar at 10.30 pm yesterday attempting to explain what I consider to be his malicious and illegal arrest and detention of Nurul Izzah yesterday.

The IGP attempts to justify her remand in the Jinjang Lockup by saying "She will be released once her statement has been recorded".  He attempts to give the impression therefore that the police were unable to record her statement yesterday hence necessitating the remand. That impression he attempts to give is false and totally unbecoming of the head of the police force.

Nurul Izzah voluntarily attended at IPD Dang Wangi today at 2 pm to have 2 statements recorded - the first by one Insp Ridzuan in relation to a Kita Lawan gathering on 14th Feb and a second one in relation to the sedition investigation on her speech in Parliament last week which was being handled by one ASP Muniandy from Bukit Aman. I had been in sms communication with Mr Muniandy on her behalf yesterday morning and confirmed the arrangement. Upon arrival at IPD Dang Wangi, we met and spoke to Muniandy and confirmed that once Nurul Izzah had completed the statement to Insp Ridzuan, she would then have her statement recorded for the sedition act investigation handled by him.

Nurul Izzah completed her statement to Insp Ridzuan for the Kita Lawan gathering by 3 pm and we were ready to start the sedition investigation statement. Instead of recording her statement, ASP Muniandy then informed us that his instructions were to arrest her first, do her arrest documentation and then record her statement. When I asked if she would be released after that, he refused to commit himself, saying he would have to get instructions from his superiors in Bukit Aman.

However when the arrest documentation was completed ( arrest report, with Nurul Izzah being fingerprinted and photographed etc ) about 5 pm, when we asked about starting recording her statement, Muniandy now said that his instructions were to remand Nurul Izzah in Jinjang Lockup and that the police would seek a further remand the next morning. Muniandy informed us that he had advised his superiors that he should complete recording Nurul Izzah's statement and release her on police bail but that his superiors'  instructions were to proceed to remand.  When we pressed him who were these superiors, although he did not name them, we were left with a clear impression these instructions were coming from the very top of the police force in Bukit Aman.

Tan Sri Khalid is lying to the public about his instructions to his officers regarding the arrest of Nurul Izzah.

All of us who were present at IPD Dang Wangi today know full well that Nurul Izzah's statement could have easily have been recorded by yesterday afternoon.  We were ready to commence it at 3 pm yesterday.

Khalid Abu Bakar should resign for his shameless lies to the public to attempt to justify his instructions to his officers to remand Nurul Izzah overnight in Jinjang Lockup, a remand which was totally unnecessary.

Khalid should know that it is obvious to all and sundry that his detention of Nurul Izzah has UMNO's political fingerprints all over it. Unintelligent lies will not make that impression go away.

Sivarasa Rasiah
Member of Parliament for Subang.
Counsel for YB Nurul Izzah

17th March 2015 

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Soalan Parlimen YB Sivarasa

 Berikut adalah soalan-soalan untuk Jawab Lisan oleh YB Sivarasa bagi sessi Parlimen yang bermula minggu ini.

Soalan Jawab Lisan

 

1. Tuan R.Sivarasa [ Subang ] meminta Menteri Kerja Raya menyatakan samaada kerajaan setuju dan akan pastikan jajaran lebuhraya Damansara Shah Alam (“DASH”) akan dipinda supaya tidak melalui kawasan perumahan dan komesial yang padat di kawasan Damansara Perdana dan juga Mutiara Damansara

2. Tuan R.Sivarasa [Subang] meminta Menteri Kewangan menyatakan bila RM 7 billion dana milik 1Malaysia Development Bhd ( 1MDB) yang dulu  ditempatkan di Cayman Islands dikembalikan ke Malaysia saperti yang umumkan oleh pengarah eksekutif 1MDB En Arul Kanda Kandasamy dan kenapa 1MDB tidak berupaya membayar hutang RM2 billion kepada Maybank dan RHB pada bulan Disember 2014.

3. Tuan R.Sivarasa [Subang] meminta Perdana Menteri menjawab dakwaan Tun Mahathir di The Edge Malaysia bertarikh 6 Oktober 2014 bahawa "1MDB tidak mempunyai sebarang sumbangan kepada negara mahupun kewangan kerajaan" (“1MDB has not contributed anything to the country, even to the government's Finance”).

 

4. Tuan R.Sivarasa [Subang] meminta Perdana Menteri menyenaraikan semua penumpang pesawat negara 9M-NAA ( yang membawa Perdana Menteri ke luar negara ke Hawaii di bulan Disember 2014) semasa pulang ke Malaysia pada 4hb Januari 2015.

 

5. Tuan R.Sivarasa [ Subang ] meminta Perdana Menteri menyatakan apa sebab Peguam Negara tidak membuat permohonan di bawah Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 di Mahkamah Rayuan selepas Korporal Sirul Azhar Umar dan Ketua Insp Azilah Hadri dibebaskan dan juga di Mahkamah Persekutuan untuk waran tangkap atau perintah sekatan atas pergerakan mereka semasa menunggu penghabisan rayuan Peguam Negara.

6.  Tuan R.Sivarasa [ Subang ] meminta Perdana Menteri dan/atau Menteri Dalam Negeri  menyatakan status siasatan dan semakan di peringkat Peguam Negara berkaitan laporan polis yang dibuat oleh Dato Mat Zain Ibrahim terhadap peguam Tan Sri Shafee Abdullah ( Putrajaya Presinct 7 Rpt 10437/13 bertarikh 15.12.2013 yang menuduh bahawa Shafee telah melakukan kesalahan jenayah dengan membuat kenyataan palsu dalam afidavitnya di Mahkamah.

7.  Tuan R.Sivarasa [Subang[ meminta Menteri Dalam Negeri menyatakan status siasatan kes 1MDB berikutan laporan polis Datuk Seri Paduka Khairuddin Abu Hassan terhadap 1MDB dan subsidiarinya (The Star, 13 Disember 2014, Umno man lodges police report against 1MDB).

8. Tuan R.Sivarasa [Subang] meminta Perdana Menteri menyatakan apakah harta pusaka yang diwarisi oleh beliau yang dirujuk dalam kenyataan Jabatan Perdana Menteri kepada New York Times yang disebut dalam rencana bertajuk ” Jho Low, Well Connected in Malaysia, Has an Appetite for New York ” bertarikh 8hb Februari 2015.

9. Tuan R.Sivarasa [Subang] meminta  Perdana Menteri menyatakan samaada kenyataan-kenyataan dalam rencana bertarikh 8.2.15 di New York Times yang berkata saperti berikut adalah betul atau tidak: (a) Isteri beliau Rosmah Mansor memiliki sekurang-kurang 9 beg tangan berjenama Birkin (b) isteri PM membeli barang kemas bernilai berjuta-juta ringgit dari Hong Kong di 2008 dan 2009  dan (c) Banyak wang tunai disimpan dalam peti besi PM saperti yang dikatakan oleh Ariff Sabri, mantan kakitangan PM tempoh 2000 – 2004.  

10. Tuan R.Sivarasa [ Subang ] meminta Perdana Menteri menyatakan punca “dana keluarga” atau “family wealth” yang dikatakan digunakan oleh anak tiri beliau Riza Aziz untuk membeli hartanah mewah di New York dan Beverley Hills bernilai tidak kurang daripada 60 juta USD dan juga untuk melabur beberapa ratus juta USD dalam industri filem di US.  

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Kenyataan Akhbar - Sirul

KENYATAAN AKHBAR 20 Januari 2015

"Peguam Negara perlu meletak jawatan dan bertanggungjawab untuk Sirul yang melarikan diri"

20 Januari 2015

Selepas keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan pada  23 Ogos 2013 yang membebaskan Ketua Inspektor Azilah Hadri dan Koperal Sirul Azhar Umar, dua orang bekas anggota UTK untuk pembunuhan wanita Mongolia Altantuya Shaariibuu, saya telah mengeluarkan kenyataan akhbar mempersoalkan mengapa Jabatan Peguam Negara tidak membuat segera permohonan di bawah seksyen 56A Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 untuk waran tangkap untuk mengekalkan tertuduh di dalam tahanan atau melepaskannya dengan jaminan sementara menunggu pendengaran rayuan Peguam Negara terhadap keputusan tersebut.

Saya telah menegaskan bahawa permohonan sedemikian biasa dibangkit oleh Timbalan Pendakwa Raya dalam keadaan apa-apa pembebasan untuk memastikan kehadiran tertuduh apabila rayuan Peguam Negara didengari. Hakikat itu tidak dilakukan dalam kes profil ini sangat tinggi menimbulkan persoalan tentang kelakuan perkara itu.

Selepas rayuan Peguam Negara telah difailkan di Mahkamah Persekutuan, terdapat satu lagi peluang untuk membuat permohonan yang sama menggunakan seksyen 66 di Akta yang sama untuk perintah jenis yang sama. Sekali lagi ini tidak dilakukan bertentangan dengan amalan biasa. Saya mengeluarkan satu lagi kenyataan mempersoalkan mengapa ia tidak dilakukan. Adakah ini disengajakan? Ketinggalan yang ketara tersebut adalah sukar untuk diterangkan sebagai akibat daripada kecuaian. Kedua-dua tertuduh harus sekurang-kurangnya dikenakan syarat-syarat ikat jamin seperti menyerahkan pasport mereka dan melapor denga kerap kepada pihak polis. Permohonan kepada mahkamah untuk mendapat perintah tersebut tidak pernah dibuat oleh Peguam Negara.

Kegagalan ini oleh Peguam Negara kini telah akibatkan keadaan di mana Sirul telah dibenarkan untuk meninggalkan negara ini dan melarikan diri dari pendengaran di Mahkamah Persekutuan di mana pembebasannya telah diterbalikkan dan sabitannya dipulihkan.

Proses pentadbiran keadilan telah dihina melalui cara Peguam Negara telah mengendalikan perkara ini.

Mesti ada siasatan penuh oleh Jemaah Menteri kepada peranan Peguam Negara telah membenarkan perkara ini berlaku.

Dalam mana-mana negara lain di mana budaya akauntabiliti diamalkan, Peguam Negara akan meletakkan jawatannya dengan serta-merta.

Sivarasa Rasiah

Ahli Parlimen Subang

Jawatankuasa Pusat dan Biro Politik Parti Keadilan Rakyat

Press Statement re Sirul

PRESS STATEMENT 20th January 2015

 

“AG should resign and be held responsible for Sirul fleeing”

 

16 January 2015

 

Shortly after the Court of Appeal decision back in 23 August 2013 acquitting Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar,  two former UTK members for the murder of Mongolian AltantuyaShaariibuu, I issued a press statement questioning why the Attorney General’s Chambers had not made an immediate application under section 56 A of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 for a warrant of arrest to keep the accused in custody or release him on bail pending the hearing of the AG’s appeal against the acquittal.

 

I had pointed out that such applications are routinely done by DPP’s in such instances of acquittals to ensure the attendance of the accused  when the AG’s appeal is heard.  The fact it was not done in this very high profile case raised questions about the conduct of the matter.

 

After the AG's appeal was filed in the Federal Court, there was yet another opportunity to make the same application using section 66 of the same Act for the same kind of order.  Again this was not done contrary to common practice. I issued another statement questioning why it was not done. Was this deliberate? Such an obvious omission was difficult to explain simply as a result of negligence. Both the accused should at least been subjected to bail conditions such as surrendering their passports and regular reporting to the police.  All that required was an application to court which was never made.

 

The result of this today is that Sirul was able to leave the country and abscond from the Federal Court hearing where his acquittal was reversed and his conviction restored. 

 

The process of administration of justice has been made a mockery by the manner the Attorney General has conducted the matter.

 

There must be a full inquiry by the Cabinet into how the Attorney-General permitted this to happen.

 

In any other country where a culture of accountability is practiced, the Attorney-General would tender his resignation immediately.

 

 

SIVARASA RASIAH

Member of Parliament for Subang                                                        

Parti Keadilan Rakyat Central Committee and Political Bureau

Monday, January 5, 2015

Repatriate Amalilio quickly to the Philippines for prosecution there

PRESS STATEMENT 

“Repatriate Amalilio quickly to the Philippines for prosecution there”

5 January 2015

It was recently reported widely in Philippine media that the Philippine Department of Justice is sending a legal team to Malaysia soon to arrange for the extradition of Amalilio. 

We welcome this initiative of the Philippine’s Department of Justice to bring suspected scam mastermind Manuel Amalilio, back from Malaysia to the Philippines to face a string of syndicated fraud charges next month. In our fact-finding trip to Manila in February 2013 we established that Amalilio, also known as Mohammad Kama bin Said, was sought by Filipino authorities for embezzling up to 15,000 investors of around RM 935 million (12 billion Pesos) in a Ponzi-type investment scheme under his company Aman Future Group back in 2012. The 15,000 victims of Amalilo include many Malaysians particularly from Sabah. 

In January 2013, Philippine law enforcers were prohibited from boarding a plane with Amalilio from Malaysia back to the Philippines. Sabah police acting supposedly on the instructions of Musa Aman, the Chief Minister, and Attorney General Gani Patail, stopped his extradition claiming that Amalilio is a Malaysian citizen, and secondly, there is no extradition agreement between Malaysia and Philippines. He was subsequently charged for holding a fake Philippine passport to which he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a period of two years in Kota Kinabalu.

At that time, we had questioned why the Malaysian authorities would be so interested in prosecuting Amalilo purportedly for having a “fake” Philippine passport. If Amalilio did in fact have a fake Philippine passport, the aggrieved party would have been the Philippine government and he should have been handed over to them. Was Amalilo’s prosecution for the so-called fake passport simply done in order to frustrate the Phillipppine government’s efforts to repatriate him?

Amalilio is a family relative to Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman and also his brother Anifah Aman, the current Foreign Minister. 

Although Amalilio was released in October this year, our government has yet to hand him over to the Philippine authorities for prosecution. 

We urge Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to give the necessary instructions immediately so that all our local agencies cooperate fully with the Philippine government and ensure that Amalilo is extradited quickly to the Philippines to face the criminal justice system there. 

We remind Prime Minister Najib that Amalilio remains on Interpol’s list of wanted criminals. We must not be seen to be harbouring wanted criminals. We must also not be seen to continue to frustrate the wishes of the Philippine people who want justice for the crimes of Amalilio. 

SIVARASA RASIAH

Member of Parliament for Subang

Member of Political Bureau and Central Committee for Parti Keadilan Rakyat

TIAN CHUA

Member of Parliament for Batu

Vice-President, Parti Keadilan Rakyat

DARELL LEIKING

Member of Parliament for Penampang

Vice-President, Parti Keadilan Rakyat